Google’s Most Advanced AI Just Got a New Body – But No Face. Why a Faceless Bot is Kind of Brilliant
One hundred years ago, a Czech playwright named Karel Capek coined the term “robot”. Right from the get-go, the overly negative ‘murderous-machine’ trope took hold, and we’ve never trusted a bot since.
Capek’s robots were as homicidal as they were helpful. In the play, they end up going on a killing spree. Not surprising, his original bots inspired Terminator, Westworld and a bunch of other machines that planted deep in our collective pop culture consciousness the idea that robots will outsmart us – and exterminate us.
The look of a robot over time
Since Capek’s initial conceptualization, robots have undergone many iterations. At the start, they were less machine, more human form. They looked like us, and had a “chemical batter” for a body instead of the expected metal material and wires.
After that, however, the robots in film, media, and art took on their more familiar machine identity. Think R2-D2, C-3PO, Rosey, Iron Giant, and the oh-so adorable WALL-E.
As science fiction gave way to science fact, we now find ourselves creating robots in real life for a whole host of different reasons. And with advanced computational power and AI, our bots are becoming as smart (and soon self-conscious) as those that George Lucas dreamed fifty years ago.
Film creations have mirrored the changes. The artificial humans in movies like Ex Machina, Blade Runnner, the Matrix, and Her are, on the surface, indistinguishable from a regular human being, and they mirror the rapidly advancing technologies in AI.
Google knows about the Uncanny Valley
So, the question is not only, What do we want our robots to do, but also, What do we want our robots to look like? Google’s latest creation harkens back to the old-school machine robots, less so the human-form android.
This, I believe, is a careful choice on their part.
A concept in aesthetic psychology called “the uncanny valley” is the relation between an object’s degree of resemblance to a human and the emotional response (positive or negative) to that object.
Objects, like some robots, that appear imperfectly human provoke uncanny or strange feelings of uneasiness and revulsion. Here’s an example of a robot called Ameca that’ll give you the heebie-jeebies. As our creations approach near perfect resemblance to human form, the ‘valley’ of revulsion disappears and we go back to liking what we see.
Google’s decision to design a ‘body’ that is nowhere near human likeness is an obvious attempt to keep clear of the uncanny valley and to therefore avoid any strong negative emotions directed towards it (or is it him or her?). It doesn’t have a face, it has one ‘arm’ with a clamp on the end of it that in no way mirrors a human hand or fingers.
The future of robots and AI
And you know what? I kind of like this robot. Or at least I’m ambivalent about it. It doesn’t scare me. It doesn’t make me feel uneasy or uncomfortable. And for a moment, I forget about the ridiculously powerful computer inside its ‘head’ that is one of the smartest machines ever designed.
I just see an obedient machine taking prompts from me to ‘make me some popcorn’ and ‘clean my toilet’. I suppose, though, that by the time I do begin to fear it, it’ll be too late.
(function() )();
